Adam lambert shirtless girl, adam lambert ring of fire photo, adam lambert believe,

Andre · Guest

are you dog food?
Don't forget all of the gen ed classes that have nothing to do with algorithm efficencies (except math).

Makeva · Guest

“Okay, what's your favorite muppet. I have to say...I kinda like Beeker

Behgal · Guest

Yes, my highly intelligent thing to say is 'Are you a Nobel Laureate'? Do you do anything close to matching a Physics Professor at UC Berkeley? If not, I suspect you have nowhere close to the brain power to really think this through as deeply as Chu (for whom, this area is his life-long work). I give him a fair amount of leeway in terms of sorting this out.If you do match all these qualifications, then kudos. Let me read your comments again..
Im a huge fan of the public option with opt-out.Statistically speaking, the states most likely to opt out (the red ones) are the biggest burden on the healthcare system anyway.Something about being stupid and unhealthy seem to go together.!

Muzandu · Guest

Oh man, Allen. So sorry to hear. Let's get this to the front page!?
OK folks, I'm an actual astronomer specializing in galaxy dynamics, so let me break this down for you. MOND was introduced to account for flat galaxy rotation curves in the absence of dark matter, at which it was very successful. However, MOND has failed to properly account for the motions of clusters of galaxies, while the LCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) theory offers a better fit to the data. In addition, contrary to what is sometimes assumed, LCDM has made a number of predictions that have now been verified. The density of dark matter haloes in the outer regions has been found to be consistent with LCDM. In addition, simulations of the large scale structure of the universe display a pattern of voids and clumps strung together by filaments of dark matter, along which a large number of galaxies are expected to lie. This has been observed - galaxies do appear to lie along filaments. And of course, there's the bullet cluster and gravitational lensing.Here's MOND's real problem: it was intended to be a very simple theory (one free parameter) that could account for observed galaxy dynamics. However, you need to keep changing it and adding more free parameters to account for the other stuff that dark matter explains naturally. What's more, there's no reason to actually think that gravity must be modified as MOND states - it's purely ad hoc. However, there are a number of well-motivated candidates for what might constitute dark matter, namely axions, WIMPS, etc, all of which have been postulated for decades by particle physicists independent of the dark matter hypothesis.So now, you have a theory that want to make an ad hoc modification to the law of gravity to fit the data and that requires a bunch of extra parameters to make it work right, or you can explain all this stuff with dark matter naturally without having to change the laws of physics. We can't see it, but we have a good idea what it has to be made up of.Do you see now why most astronomers don't take MOND very seriously?

Leeon · Guest

Because it's made by Apple. That's it.

Anggrein · Guest

Yeah, the site used to work great for me on firefox, now not at all. They changed something to ruin it within the past couple months.

Timmoney · Guest

I think they could actually do a pretty good episode about that.

Vanane · Guest

!

adrienne bailon nude