American idol voting rigged against adam lambert, adrienne bailon uncensored naked pics, you tube adam lambert tracks of my tears,

Gugulethu · Guest

Easy, they got them addicted to Mountain Dew.
*Sings*"One of these flu-s is not like the other...One of these flu-s just doesn't belong..."I find this link MUCH more helpful:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WhuikFY1Pg(ps, I don't know the plural of flu, but "flu-s" fits, so :p)

Repalust · Guest

“I dont use Bing because its terrible, its that simple. Search results are wierd to say the least and sometimes dont even relate to what you were searching for. Its one redeeming feature is the image search, yet even that doesnt yield anywhere near as many results as Google. Its a good first try, and I'm sure in a few years will be awesome, but right now its unusable. And Bing is a very odd word. Google is gibberish I know, but it sounds less stupid when you say it out loud. I would never say Bing out loud.

Labastilla · Guest

See, people? You don't need the /s..
".... Nintendo has always lagged behind technology."? I'm not a gaming expert but isn't Microsoft the one playing technology catch-up here?!

Gillian · Guest

Use a piece of paper: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrXmDiYHUY0?
The visuals are impressive considering, but the sound is really lacking, especially the music...

Jonine · Guest

I just have an appreciation for horror. But that's not to say I like every horror movie out there. Slashers bore me. I prefer a good ghosty type horror movie. An American Haunting would've been awesome if they didn't say at the end "she was raped" *sigh*. Why can't we just have a creepy ghost/demon movie like The Exorcist? I get more chills watching A Haunting on the Discovery Channel (even though some episodes are hilarous) than most current "horror" movies.

Etherton · Guest

White Christian males are in charge of pretty much the entire system minus the presidency. They will never get that treatment.

Sheethal · Guest

OK folks, I'm an actual astronomer specializing in galaxy dynamics, so let me break this down for you. MOND was introduced to account for flat galaxy rotation curves in the absence of dark matter, at which it was very successful. However, MOND has failed to properly account for the motions of clusters of galaxies, while the LCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) theory offers a better fit to the data. In addition, contrary to what is sometimes assumed, LCDM has made a number of predictions that have now been verified. The density of dark matter haloes in the outer regions has been found to be consistent with LCDM. In addition, simulations of the large scale structure of the universe display a pattern of voids and clumps strung together by filaments of dark matter, along which a large number of galaxies are expected to lie. This has been observed - galaxies do appear to lie along filaments. And of course, there's the bullet cluster and gravitational lensing.Here's MOND's real problem: it was intended to be a very simple theory (one free parameter) that could account for observed galaxy dynamics. However, you need to keep changing it and adding more free parameters to account for the other stuff that dark matter explains naturally. What's more, there's no reason to actually think that gravity must be modified as MOND states - it's purely ad hoc. However, there are a number of well-motivated candidates for what might constitute dark matter, namely axions, WIMPS, etc, all of which have been postulated for decades by particle physicists independent of the dark matter hypothesis.So now, you have a theory that want to make an ad hoc modification to the law of gravity to fit the data and that requires a bunch of extra parameters to make it work right, or you can explain all this stuff with dark matter naturally without having to change the laws of physics. We can't see it, but we have a good idea what it has to be made up of.Do you see now why most astronomers don't take MOND very seriously?

Diyaksha · Guest

!

adam lambert brigadoon mp3